The state Dem model: Be low-key and generally inoffensive?

Submitted by lucidity on Wed, 05/31/2006 - 9:36am.

Reporter Rebecca Walsh in Sunday's Salt Lake Tribune. I suppose the first step to winning over Republican voters is to get them past the idea that Democrats are baby-killing traitors who hate America. Still, I wish we were farther along the negative-neutral-positive scale than this:

Twenty-five years ago, two politicians were the hope of Utah's Democratic Party: Salt Lake City Mayor Ted Wilson and U.S. Rep. Wayne Owens. [...]

Wilson and Owens have been replaced by U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson and Salt Lake County Mayor Peter Corroon. And while it's still too early to say a trend is in the making, the congressman and county executive are being cast as Utah Democrats' future: fiscally and socially conservative, predictable, low-key and generally inoffensive.

"It makes sense if you are a Democrat in a state that's so overwhelmingly Republican to try to lay low, govern effectively and make a better reputation for your party," says Kelly Patterson, director of Brigham Young University's Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy. "That's a good long-term strategy."

I wonder what the state party has to say about that. Anyone out there want to comment?

Don't call ME inoffensive!!

#191 On Wed, 05/31/2006 6:39pm emoticon said,

I have been highly unimpressed with Rebecca Walsh's take in most of her articles about the Utah State Democrats. I don't want to cast aspersions on a single individual, but in general, it seems to be very easy to continue to write about the perception of our party attempting to win by presentng as conservative, and generally inoffensive.

I would like to suggest that if anyone wants to report on the future of the Utah State Democratic Party that they actually show up to a convention to hear the candidates. I certainly don't think Pete Ashdown is conservative, and have you checked out his "low key" Ashdown mobile?? I KNOW that Trish Beck, Steve Olsen, and Jim Winder are not "predictable".

Regarding our Salt Lake Mayor Peter Corroon's stance on the Salt Lake Real's pressure to get a soccer stadium built in the County, how low key is it to take a stance against the Salt Lake Real's pressure to build a soccer stadium in our county? That was certainly fiscally conservative perhaps. However, this is a welcome contrast to the 15 million dollar parking fiasco the Republican office holders voted for in the last legislative session.

Since when did "inoffensive"become a problem? Is it as pejorative as (shock) LIBERAL???

I'm not a representative of the State party, so just take my comments as those of a dedicated, inoffensive, liberal Demorat activist.

And no private e mails about that self labeled "inoffenisve" statement.

Sheryl, no one would ever

#192 On Wed, 05/31/2006 8:13pm lucidity said,

Sheryl, no one would ever call you inoffensive. ;)

I think Rebecca Walsh's reporting is far better than that of Dan Harrie or Glen Warchol. Check out this if you don't believe me.

That's a good point about Corroon's Salt Lake Real decision being neither low-key nor predictable. I smell a letter to the editor!

Lead By Example

#193 On Thu, 06/01/2006 12:57pm JMBell said,

Here's my two personal bits.

One of the reasons that Rep. Jim Matheson polls so well, is that, while he is a Democrat, party theology is not his first priority. Representation of his constituents is his first priority and it shows in both his reelections and poll numbers. Look at Matheson’s stances on the federal budget, PFS, Divine Strake and protecting kids from porn. He’s anything but low key or predictable.

Mayor Corroon is another example of being impressive by doing his job the way he told voters he would. Open, honest and responsible government at its best: by a Democrat. The Mayor’s stand on MLS, for example, was, again, a gutsy move that protected the interests of the people of not only Salt Lake County, but the whole state. Again, not low key, inoffensive or predictable.

What do these two men have in common? They lead by example. They do a good job. They represent the people who voted for them (and those that didn’t) by hard work, determination and good government. I don’t recall reading that in Walsh’s article.

I believe that Walsh, and most of the others at the Tribune (and to a lesser degree, the Des News) are stuck in a moment that they can’t get out of. They’re either habitual Democrat bashers or not imaginative enough to wrap their heads around new energy, new ideas, and representational government.

Thanks Jeff...another

#196 On Thu, 06/01/2006 8:12pm emoticon said,

Thanks Jeff...another inoffensive observation by you..
love you!
Sheryl
I couldn't have said it all better...although I tried.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.